|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
10/01/2023 |
Actualizado : |
10/01/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
GUARIN, J. R.; MARTRE, P; EWERT, F.; WEBBER, H.; DUERI, S.; CALDERINI, D.; REYNOLDS, M.; MOLERO, G.; MIRALLES, D.; GARCIA, G.; SLAFER, G.; GIUNTA, F.; PEQUENO, D. N. L.; STELLA, T.; AHMED, M.; ALDERMAN, P. D.; BASSO, B.; BERGER, A.; BINDI, M.; BRACHO-MUJICA, G.; CAMMARANO, D.; CHEN, Y.; DUMONT, B.; REZAEI, E. E.; FERERES, E.; FERRISE, R.; GAISER, T.; GAO, Y.; GARCIA-VILA, M.; GAYLER, S.; HOCHMAN, Z.; HOOGENBOOM, G.; HUNT, L. A.; KERSEBAUM, K. C.; NENDEL, C.; OLESEN, J. E.; PALOSUO, T.; PRIESACK, E.; PULLENS, J. W. M.; RODRÍGUEZ, A.; RÖTTER, R. P.; RUIZ RAMOS, M.; SEMENOV, M. A.; SENAPATI, N.; SIEBERT, S.; SRIVASTAVA, A. M.; STÖCKLE, C.; SUPIT, I.; TAO, F.; THORBURN, P.; WANG, E.; WEBER, T. K. D.; XIAO, L.; ZHANG, Z.; ZHAO, C.; ZHAO, J.; ZHAO, Z.; ZHU, Y.; ASSENG, S. |
Afiliación : |
JOSE RAFAEL GUARIN, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Dpt., Univ. of Florida, FL, USA; Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia Univ., NY, USA; NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NY, USA.; PIERRE MARTRE, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; FRANK EWERT, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; HEIDI WEBBER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; SIBYLLE DUERI, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; DANIEL CALDERINI, Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia, Chile; MATTHEW REYNOLDS, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; GEMMA MOLERO, KWS, Lille, France; DANIEL MIRALLES, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUILLERMO GARCIA, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUSTAVO SLAFER, Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida—AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain; and ICREA, Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain; FRANCESCO GIUNTA, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Ital; DIEGO N L PEQUENO, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; TOMMASO STELLA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; MUKHTAR AHMED, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; PHILLIP D ALDERMAN, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States of America; BRUNO BASSO, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCO BINDI, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; GENNADY BRACHO-MUJICA, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; DAVIDE CAMMARANO, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America; YI CHEN, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; BENJAMIN DUMONT, Department Terra & AgroBioChem, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Gembloux, Belgium; EHSAN EYSHI REZAEI, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; ELIAS FERERES, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; ROBERTO FERRISE, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; THOMAS GAISER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; YUJING GAO, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; MARGARITA GARCIA-VILA, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; SEBASTIAN GAYLER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; ZVI HOCHMAN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; GERRIT HOOGENBOOM, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; LESLIE A HUNT, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; KURT C KERSEBAUM, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Rep; CLAAS NENDEL, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Repu; JØRGEN E OLESEN, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; TARU PALOSUO, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; ECKART PRIESACK, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; JOHANNES W M PULLENS, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ALFREDO RODRÍGUEZ, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; REIMUND P RÖTTER, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; MARGARITA RUIZ RAMOS, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; MIKHAIL A SEMENOV, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; NIMAI SENAPATI, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; STEFAN SIEBERT, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; CLAUDIO STÖCKLE, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America; IWAN SUPIT, Water & Food and Water Systems & Global Change Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; FULU TAO, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; PETER THORBURN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; ENLI WANG, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; TOBIAS KARL DAVID WEBER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Current affiliation: Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Organic Soil Sciences, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany; LIUJUN XIAO, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiang; ZHAO ZHANG, State Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; CHUANG ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; JIN ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ZHIGAN ZHAO, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Department of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; YAN ZHU, National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for M; SENTHOLD ASSENG, 8 Department of Life Science Engineering, Digital Agriculture, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. |
Título : |
Evidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Environmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
ISSN : |
1748-9326 |
DOI : |
10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) -- |
Contenido : |
Wheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd |
Palabras claves : |
Crop model ensemble; Global food security; Radiation use efficiency; Wheat potential yield; Yield increase. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03876naa a2200913 a 4500 001 1063941 005 2023-01-10 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1748-9326 024 7 $a10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c$2DOI 100 1 $aGUARIN, J. R. 245 $aEvidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) -- 520 $aWheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd 653 $aCrop model ensemble 653 $aGlobal food security 653 $aRadiation use efficiency 653 $aWheat potential yield 653 $aYield increase 700 1 $aMARTRE, P 700 1 $aEWERT, F. 700 1 $aWEBBER, H. 700 1 $aDUERI, S. 700 1 $aCALDERINI, D. 700 1 $aREYNOLDS, M. 700 1 $aMOLERO, G. 700 1 $aMIRALLES, D. 700 1 $aGARCIA, G. 700 1 $aSLAFER, G. 700 1 $aGIUNTA, F. 700 1 $aPEQUENO, D. N. L. 700 1 $aSTELLA, T. 700 1 $aAHMED, M. 700 1 $aALDERMAN, P. D. 700 1 $aBASSO, B. 700 1 $aBERGER, A. 700 1 $aBINDI, M. 700 1 $aBRACHO-MUJICA, G. 700 1 $aCAMMARANO, D. 700 1 $aCHEN, Y. 700 1 $aDUMONT, B. 700 1 $aREZAEI, E. E. 700 1 $aFERERES, E. 700 1 $aFERRISE, R. 700 1 $aGAISER, T. 700 1 $aGAO, Y. 700 1 $aGARCIA-VILA, M. 700 1 $aGAYLER, S. 700 1 $aHOCHMAN, Z. 700 1 $aHOOGENBOOM, G. 700 1 $aHUNT, L. A. 700 1 $aKERSEBAUM, K. C. 700 1 $aNENDEL, C. 700 1 $aOLESEN, J. E. 700 1 $aPALOSUO, T. 700 1 $aPRIESACK, E. 700 1 $aPULLENS, J. W. M. 700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, A. 700 1 $aRÖTTER, R. P. 700 1 $aRUIZ RAMOS, M. 700 1 $aSEMENOV, M. A. 700 1 $aSENAPATI, N. 700 1 $aSIEBERT, S. 700 1 $aSRIVASTAVA, A. M. 700 1 $aSTÖCKLE, C. 700 1 $aSUPIT, I. 700 1 $aTAO, F. 700 1 $aTHORBURN, P. 700 1 $aWANG, E. 700 1 $aWEBER, T. K. D. 700 1 $aXIAO, L. 700 1 $aZHANG, Z. 700 1 $aZHAO, C. 700 1 $aZHAO, J. 700 1 $aZHAO, Z. 700 1 $aZHU, Y. 700 1 $aASSENG, S. 773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
03/01/2019 |
Actualizado : |
11/11/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
GARMENDIA, G.; PATTARINO, L.; NEGRIN, C.; MARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, A.; PEREYRA, S.; WARD, T.J.; VERO, S. |
Afiliación : |
GABRIELA GARMENDIA, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, General Flores 2124, 11800, Montevideo, Uruguay.; LUCIANA PATTARINO, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; CAMILA NEGRIN TORRES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; ADALGISA MARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.; SILVIA ANTONIA PEREYRA CORREA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; TODD J. WARD, Mycotoxin Prevention and Applied Microbiology, USDA-ARS, 1815 N, University St.Peoria, IL, 61604, USA.; SILVANA VERO, Área Microbiología, Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Species composition, toxigenic potential and aggressiveness of Fusarium isolates causing Head Blight of barley in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Food Microbiology, v. 76, December 2018, p. 426-433. |
ISSN : |
1095-9998 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.005 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 22 September 2017// Revised 14 March 2018//Accepted 12 July 2018// Available online 17 July 2018. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related to the sampled hosts. Inter and intraspecific differences were observed in aggressiveness toward four barley genotypes with different levels of resistance to FHB, and in general nivalenol producers were the least aggressive isolates. Sensitivity to metconazole was approximately 10 times higher than was detected for tebuconazole. This is the first report regarding tebuconazole and metconazole sensitivity for Fusarium species causing FHB in barley in Uruguay, and constitutes an important starting point for monitoring temporal or spatial changes in FGSC sensitivity, which is critical to define FHB management practices. MenosABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BARLEY; MYCOTOXINS. |
Thesagro : |
CEBADA; FUSARIUM; MICOTOXINAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
Marc : |
LEADER 03057naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1059407 005 2019-11-11 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1095-9998 024 7 $a10.1016/j.fm.2018.07.005$2DOI 100 1 $aGARMENDIA, G. 245 $aSpecies composition, toxigenic potential and aggressiveness of Fusarium isolates causing Head Blight of barley in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received 22 September 2017// Revised 14 March 2018//Accepted 12 July 2018// Available online 17 July 2018. 520 $aABSTRACT:Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) is a major constraint to barley production that substantially reduces yield and grain quality. FHB is also a major food safety concern because FHB pathogens contaminate grain with trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. DNA sequence-based analyses and in-vitro toxin assessments were used to characterize the species and trichothecene chemotype composition of FHB pathogens on barley in Uruguay. F. graminearum was the dominant species (89.7%), and three other members of the F. graminearum species complex (FGSC) were identified as FHB pathogens of barley in Uruguay for the first time. Other minor contributors to FHB species diversity included F. poae, F. avenaceum, F. pseudograminearum and an unnamed species from the F. incarnatumequiseti species complex (FIESC). Most isolates (89.7%) had the 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) trichothecene type. However, the results expanded the known area of occurrence within Uruguay for the nivalenol (NIV) toxin type, which was observed among isolates from three species of the FGSC, F. pseudograminearum, and F. poae. Isolates with the 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) or NX-2 toxin types were not observed, although a previously published multilocus genotyping assay was updated to identify NX-2 strains. Analyses of population structure and comparisons with FHB isolates from wheat in Uruguay indicated that F. graminearum constitutes a single genetic population with no evidence of population differentiation related to the sampled hosts. Inter and intraspecific differences were observed in aggressiveness toward four barley genotypes with different levels of resistance to FHB, and in general nivalenol producers were the least aggressive isolates. Sensitivity to metconazole was approximately 10 times higher than was detected for tebuconazole. This is the first report regarding tebuconazole and metconazole sensitivity for Fusarium species causing FHB in barley in Uruguay, and constitutes an important starting point for monitoring temporal or spatial changes in FGSC sensitivity, which is critical to define FHB management practices. 650 $aCEBADA 650 $aFUSARIUM 650 $aMICOTOXINAS 653 $aBARLEY 653 $aMYCOTOXINS 700 1 $aPATTARINO, L. 700 1 $aNEGRIN, C. 700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ-SILVEIRA, A. 700 1 $aPEREYRA, S. 700 1 $aWARD, T.J. 700 1 $aVERO, S. 773 $tFood Microbiology$gv. 76, December 2018, p. 426-433.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|